Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Michalski vs Adrian Oetzbach Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - 07-04-24
By Wojtek Kolan - July 4, 2024
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Oetzbach analysis and find out who is favored!
Michalski VS Oetzbach PREDICTION Clay
M25 Marburg atp
04 Jul 2024 / Second
Michalski Vs Oetzbach Match Overview - When Will They Play?
Daniel Michalski takes on Adrian Oetzbach in the atp M25 Marburg Men's Singles 2024 on July 4, 2024. Our Expert betting tips are based on over 200,000 past match simulations. When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Michalski Vs Oetzbach is now available here.
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Daniel Michalski vs Adrian Oetzbach Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Michalski 0 - 0 Oetzbach
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.2% of points on their second serve, while Oetzbach has won 44.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 52.87% of their opponent's second serve points, while Oetzbach has won 53.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.54% and 35.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Oetzbach has saved 52.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 55.74% of matches played (W/L 34/ 27), with Oetzbach winning 60% (W/L 63/ 42) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 186/ 98), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Oetzbach has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 66/ 44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 15/ 20), where as Oetzbach has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.86% of matches (W/L 60/ 37). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.9 while Oetzbach has played against players with an average rank of 109.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Oetzbach has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 47.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Oetzbach has converted 42.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
407
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
516
Rank
516
High
26
Age
R
Plays
Form
62% (219-134)
Career Total W/L
55% (222-179)
53% (19-17)
YTD W/L
51% (23-22)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Current Event Stats To Check Player Form & Enhance Prediction Accuracy
M25 Marburg
Clay| stats | Daniel Michalski | Adrian Oetzbach |
|---|---|---|
| Total Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Last Match | 1:49:00 | 1:36:00 |
| Total Time | 1:49:00 | 1:36:00 |
| Aces Pg | 0.13 | 0.5 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 4 |
| DFs Per Game | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 2 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (35/48) | 64% (30/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (24/35) | 70% (21/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (8/13) | 47% (8/17) |
| Total BPs Won% | 45% (5/11) | 67% (6/9) |
| Total BPs Saved | 50% (1/2) | 60% (3/5) |
| Service Hold (%) | 88% (7/8) | 75% (6/8) |
| Opp Hold (%) | 38% (3/8) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Pts W% | 54% (36/67) | 55% (36/66) |
| Total Pts Won | 59% (68/115) | 58% (65/113) |
| Tiebreak W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Per Match | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Michalski vs Oetzbach Hot Tip:
We predict there is a 42.12% chance of the Michalski vs Oetzbach match having over 21 games.
Michalski Vs Oetzbach Prediction: Who Wins?
TennisTipster88 : After in-depth analysis of past career performance, current form, and the head-to-head matches of Daniel Michalski and Adrian Oetzbach, we give Michalski a 73.11% chance of winning and Oetzbach 26.89% chance of victory. Our prediction: Michalski wins. If you want to bet on this match it's very important you take the best odds available into consideration as it is the odds value relative to the probability of the outcome that is important. Check out our today's tennis predictions page for full value bet analysis of this and all WTA, ATP and ITF tennis matches!
The Best Odds For Daniel Michalski vs Adrian Oetzbach For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Michalski VS Oetzbach
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Adrian Oetzbach |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 53% (17/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (37/26) | 50% (37/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (319/277) | 50% (340/340) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 74 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 151 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:17 | 1:51:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 316.38 | 136.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1186/1998) | 59% (1214/2046) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (771/1186) | 67% (814/1214) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (421/812) | 45% (373/831) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (100/209) | 41% (102/247) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (867/1975) | 42% (908/2148) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 53% (17/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 70% (7/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 13% (16/2) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Daniel Michalski
Player
Matthew William Donald
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sebastian Gima
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Leopold Zima
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
August Holmgren
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrian Oetzbach Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Mika Lipp
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Daniel De Jonge
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
5
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Lodewijk Weststrate
57%
(
72 of
127)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
117)
11
Aces
9
12
Double Faults
6
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
35%
(
44 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Sebastian Grundtvig
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
42%
(
18 of
43)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Michalski Vs Oetzbach Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Michalski are available here and Oetzbach photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Michalski
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Adrian Oetzbach
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
